• 0

    posted a message on Forums 's activity is very small...
    Quote from Ufifa85 >>
    Quote from RagingOtter >>

    ^Sadly it's not going to happen, The forums are basically not even a part of the website at this point. We're simply here.

     maybe yes... I requested sugesstion to futhead mods!
     I talk to them on a daily basis, not happening anytime soon, not a top priority. Traffic will pick back up around the new launch date...possibly.
    Posted in: Futhead Forums News & Updates
  • 1

    posted a message on Forums 's activity is very small...

    ^Sadly it's not going to happen, The forums are basically not even a part of the website at this point. We're simply here.

    Posted in: Futhead Forums News & Updates
  • 0

    posted a message on Forums 's activity is very small...

    Yup spot on^^.

    I've seen this with so many gaming forums, there's life cycles to them. Unless it's a game that has more than a 9 month life cycle the forums activity is strictly based on the games life cycle.

    You might get a slight increase in activity on a forum when new details of the next installment come around, the only thing that keeps fifa as a game "alive" is the TOTS which they only have what which realistically...We've had the Prem/Bundesliga/Ligue 1/Belgian League/Dutch League and the Turkish League.

    The last "big" leagues are Serie A which i believe is this week/ La Liga and then MLS probably being the last one of note which that comes out nearly at the start of the next FIFA.

    The other Random leagues are of little to no interest to the majority of the community

    Posted in: Futhead Forums News & Updates
  • 0

    posted a message on Forums 's activity is very small...
    Quote from Ufifa85 >>
    Quote from RagingOtter >>

    The forums don't have a direct link from the FH Site you have to really search for it.

    FIFA is also at the end of it's life cycle and like many games (I used to be a part of one of the bigger COD forums around in the early days) Every year near the end of a games life cycle, people tend to vanish, there isn't much to talk about besides some DLC (or in this case special cards) Everyone knows the issues with a game what's broken and what works best.

    It's also the start of summer, school is winding down for a large group of people which usually means Sports/Work/Social lives in general pick up a bit more so not as many people playing games.

    67 people online isn't too far from the norm around here.

     And when i were online, there not showed me on online users list!
     I have literally 0 control over that (or at least I assume I don't) 98% of the people that are "online" are guests which to me isn't a glitch in the system, it's more just saying people google something about FIFA Forums and they happened across this one.

    You have to go to the main page,click FH then click forums. For something involving FIFA The Forums should have direct access from the main site and accounts don't even crossover. It's 2 seperate accounts and most people aren't going to bother to create a second account for 2 sights that should in theory be connected.
    Posted in: Futhead Forums News & Updates
  • 1

    posted a message on Forums 's activity is very small...

    The forums don't have a direct link from the FH Site you have to really search for it.

    FIFA is also at the end of it's life cycle and like many games (I used to be a part of one of the bigger COD forums around in the early days) Every year near the end of a games life cycle, people tend to vanish, there isn't much to talk about besides some DLC (or in this case special cards) Everyone knows the issues with a game what's broken and what works best.

    It's also the start of summer, school is winding down for a large group of people which usually means Sports/Work/Social lives in general pick up a bit more so not as many people playing games.

    67 people online isn't too far from the norm around here.

    Posted in: Futhead Forums News & Updates
  • 0

    posted a message on huddersfield promoted

    I'd say they are more likely to challenge for the record of least amount of points in the a Prem Season ever (which btw...is 11 by Derby County not too long ago)

    Posted in: World of Football
  • 0

    posted a message on 2016/17 Premier League Prediction?
    Quote from Chargersrock54 >>

    Update: looking at all the tables if season ended today I'd have most correct lol, you guys getting beat by someone who's watched PL for less than 2 years just saying

     I've only been watching for a 4-5 years (Gotta love american broadcasts even in the early 2000's was basically Major International games....MLS(sometimes) and then sometimes MASSIVE Champions league games.

    Besides that we just didn't have access to it. You had to watch streams or read up on it.
    Posted in: World of Football
  • 1

    posted a message on How can pace stats be so useless?

    It's not all about pace.

    You also lose pace when on the ball which why nearly all defenders can catch you (it's their balancing method)
    Not to mention that little tiny gravitational pull defenders have on most attacking players if they get near them you can rarely get away from it and then if you're weaker you're fucked. end of story.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Long Live Lukaku!!!

    You know what the best thing about this topic is?

    The fact if I wasn't up to date on Man U's affairs in the league/europe whereever they may be at the time....The title allows me to know exactly what happened....or in most cases didn't happen which is a win
    (at least you draw which is more then my team has been able to say as of late BUT you're in 6th and we aren't so I can gloat this week :P)

    Posted in: World of Football
  • 0

    posted a message on EA scripting 2.0 in accordance to 'weird losing streak'
    Quote from silencer727 >>

     

    I used to be a strong scripting believer but I am more and more convinced it is to blame on FIFA it's netcode and lag compensation.

    While there are scripted elements as that is how games are made, they don't work against us as much as we like to believe.

     

    The rumour is that FIFA runs at a server/connection tick rate of about 10 hz so the server/connection updates 10 times per second.

    Put in some wifi a good range and you have a true shitstorm of a connection with packetloss even decreasing the aprox 10hz ticks. 

    This gives all these gaps in updating what happens on the field, your input and so on. 

     

    EA ''fixes'' this by putting in lag compensation that fills in these gaps for you, ''predicting'' what will happen and thus smoothing out the experience so the player won't notice these gaps/lags.

     

    Now I will tell a story about Battlefield 3.

    This also ran at a tick-rate of approximately 10hz.

    It was filled with issues in connection.

    There were kill trades, two people shooting each other, not seeing the other return fire but still both die.

    Kills behind cover, running behind cover, being save, still get hit and die.

    Rubber banding, running forward but keep getting pulled back a few steps.

    Plus there were some hitreg issues, people getting hit when they weren't physically hit. (missed shots around player hit the player).

     

    The community was OUTRAGEOUS! EA was TRASH! releasing this. And they were hammered down in the press, so they were instantly on it and they fixed it!

    BF3 was super smooth after that, BF4 uses the same technology as does BF1. Fairly simple, they ''optimized'' the hitreg but most importantly upped the server tick-rates from 10hz to 60hz.

    As I believe is THE solution for FIFA.

     

    But if only... only the FIFA  community were as outrageous about it as the Battlefield community was... (and maybe the press? FutHead *hint *hint)

     

    I will also tell you why EA just doesn't do it them selves, because they will loose half their clients because they cannot maintain a connection of 60hz plus they loose a lot more money on server maintenance and overall server costs. 

     

    ''For the player''...

     

     

    One theory I have for finding the best games, only do games you find instantly, if you press search opponent and it takes a few seconds, it is expanding its search area, going further and further, giving you a higher latency.

    This does not guarantee anything, because sometimes.. the matchmaking is just... EA...

    But generally this gives me the best experience

     

    Plus WIFI is super bad! it is unfit and unstable for gaming, unless you run 5ghz which consoles can't do so stay away from wifi please!

     

    Dedicated servers are the answer but not at 10hz...

     Ill make a point on your last sentence.

    Dedicated Servers IMO are better served when the game is hosting multiple players (Battlefield/COD/Halo etc)
    However even with dedicated servers if you have a piss poor connection, a dedicated server isn't going to magically give you a solid connection to the match.

    Even in Sports games where it's typically 1v1 there 1 of the 2 players is still technically "hosting" the match. Those Ping bars we see before the game is ones connection to our opponent,not the server. We all connect "fine" to the actual EA servers it's why we can run a game in general but if my opponent is running on fucken dial up (does anyone still run on dial up?) then he's still going to be lagging out the ass and the server is going to attempt to create a good connection between the 2 of us and it's going to ail miserable because it simply can not fix it.
    ---

    COD used to be P2P connections which was absolutely fine as long as someone with a solid connection got picked for host, a good host could run a lobby for hours and nearly everyone in the lobby would function perfectly fine, however bad connections would have lag issues, not to the host....but to everyone else in the lobby they would notice that players lag.
    It used to be considered "host advantage" in COD (and it was real, i was lucky enough to enjoy it many many times through out my COD days)
    The host especially if he was half decent player would absolutely melt entire lobbies with ease (now these players could typically still do very well if they weren't on host,unless the host was complete shit)


    After many years of people complaining about Host Advantage (because obviously that was the reason most players were doing poorly,it's like the fifa community complaining about things that do work and EA changing them to appease the bad players) They Allowed for a player to still obtain Host....except they added in Lag Compensation to the game, which meant the actual host....ended up on a disadvantage. It was the games way of Providing a solid connection to the lobby while making sure the host didn't have a "unfair" advantage over everyone so they almost put him one 1 second delay to everyone else in the lobby and you could honestly feel it. a 3+ K/d player like myself knows when he messes up and knows when it's the games connection, that was a failed experiment and they mellowed it out and basically made it so there was a host....but for the most part everyone was on equal playing fields. If you had a good connection you were fine, if you didn't you suffered end of story.

    You only need an ok internet connection to play nearly any game on the market smoothly, when you start trying to create a false connection to your servers to make players happy who feel they'd be better if there was no host advantage.

    I mean I have a 47up/7 Down connection that is more then sufficient to run any game on the market with 0 issues. FIFA could give a shit less.
    I play against my buddy in england all the time as well as with him in Co-Op and lag is a near none issue and we're 3000miles apart from eachother. So when it comes down to it. Most lag is create by lack of servers open on Weekends+ opponents (or yourself) having a poor connection or playing on WiFi. Button Delay and actual lag are two completely different things as well.

    Sure it's worse when there's lag but the input delay seems be fairly standard even on good connections. 
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on EA scripting 2.0 in accordance to 'weird losing streak'
    Quote from Seki >>

    These Butland scripts are really something. I just had 11 damn fine shots on target in the first 20 minutes, all saved by this douch. Then on the counter attack, EA made me switch players two times, while I didn't press anything, and his first shot went in by my De Gea's hand and head. After that, I had a few more chances, all denied by Butland.

     

    My opponent stated he was without words about what happened here, saying he was absolutely useless and I should have won this game by miles.

     Well butland is broken we all know that.

    As for the switching....idk what your settings are on...typically it won't switch with your command unless you have air balls on auto switch (which is a hit or miss function for you sanity)

    They do it in Co-Op where the game will decide If My buddy or I will pass across goal or really anything to eachother it randomly switches us around which we don't expect and then the scoring chances goes missing because the game decided "oh let's switch whos controlling what player"
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Not able to get in anymore

    Servers are down on and off all day. It's because of the legends fuck up they had yesterday

    When something breaks or something simple like accidentally* adding legends into PS4/PC on the search bar....they will almost always fuck something up when fixing something else.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on EA scripting 2.0 in accordance to 'weird losing streak'

    I think the biggest thing is the majority of the community is middle of the road skill wise (which is fine that's not an insult)
    But that group varies so much so you could easily be a lot better then another average player but still get dicked by someone who couldn't hold a torch to another player.

    You also don't know what exactly your opponent was going through in previous matches. Maybe he was just dicked over in a few matches and he's finally having all the luck while you may have been on a good run and aren't getting any luck.

    A lot of it is mental imo. The person you're playing doesn't know what you've dealt with in matches previous but chances are you are still fuming over those games which has an effect on how you play, you more than likely start to try and force things to happen (not always but it's a safe bet)

    The game is shit in general which is a shame because they have other games with the same game mode that on all accounts functions just fine.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Another Bronze Bench Thread
    Quote from MJELEB >>

    I still wonder if 'handicap' is the result of the game messing up stamina.

     

    I had a few games in the tournament last night and was getting a lot of rage quits as I was starting really well.  I lost in the semi final in a fairly even game but then in the next run I got to the final and again I had gone 2-0 up and was destroying the guy.  In the second half he got a very lucky goal and he'd barely had an attack let alone a goal scoring chance at this point.  I was going to shout 'xbox record that' as it was a ridiculous goal but I figured I'd watch it back in the replays.

     

    Anyway, once he'd got that first goal my players all acted like they had no stamina left and there was nothing I could do.  Suddenly my Ronaldo and Best for examples had the ball taken off them before they could take a touch etc. and I couldn't get out of my own half.  Before you say, this wasn't because he'd turned up the pressure and gone all out attack.  If he'd done that then my players would still be able to pass and run etc. and I'd just have to adjust.   I ended up losing 3-2 and there was absolutely nothing I could do about it.

     

    Annoyingly on the replays there were only 4!   And my opponents first goal wasn't one of the highlights!  Why does the game do this?  Sometimes there's 7 to 9 highlights yet in some games it only shows 3-4 when there were more goals than highlights.  It seems to miss out the 'dodgy' goal as well which is suspicious to me.  Surely it should always show at least the goals.

     Shit servers imo, sometimes they record multiple "highlights" other times they just shit the bed. I've had games where they've decided multiple tackles were more of highlight vs a 3-4 goals scored in the game.

    I do believe there's a sense of momentum when it comes to your team giving up a goal. Especially if it's after you've gone up 2-0. The whole saying that a 2 goal lead is the worst lead in sports and I think fifa took it seriously.

    Now I admit, you see happen in sports all the time (Hockey/Football/Baseball) 2-0 just isn't incredibly "safe" and in FIFA because of the 6 min Halves it's increased greatly in terms of how your team is affected by it.

    So you give up a goal and suddenly they are 1 goal away from equalizing and your team just kind of acts up.
    ---
    However more to that point I do feel certain players/teams (depending on your game mode) have their heads on straight. My buddy and I will use liverpool and we're pretty convinced anytime it's at Anfield....even if we go down a goal, something about Liverpool at Anfield makes the team almost never give up. They constantly attack make good tackles and create chances.
    Meanwhile Real Madrid almost always seems to collapse if they give up a goal or 2 which is a bit insane considering we've seen them come back all the time from being down in a game.

    Man U in Co-Op can do absolutely no wrong, every time we play them we are resigned to losing. Every bounce goes their way. Ibra runs around like he's at 99 Pace, Shaw and Velencia are god tier. Pogba bodies everyone off the ball and out runs them. and obviously that broken CB pairing is well...broken. Goalies start acting up.
    De Gea PUNCHES out perfect counter attack balls, He punched a ball last night 40yds down field to Ibra who then dinked it to Mhk who then chipped it back into the box for ibra who JUMPED AND TRIED TO VOLLEY IT...Ramos was standing there deflected the shot but because ibra hit him on a jumping volley...the game decided that was a pen...Navas then got a full hand on it and it still went over his hand and into the goal.

    We really should just quit when we play Man U.
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on EA scripting 2.0 in accordance to 'weird losing streak'

    The games servers especially weekend league are a joke. They put the games onto separate servers. Which means less servers and still a large chunk of players trying to play on them so lag is something they need to seriously work out.

    "dedicated" servers aren't the answer because a bad connection will still be a bad connection as someone in the lobby technically hosts the match anyways. The dedicated servers don't do much for sports games in terms of connections it's more beneficial to larger group games as long as players being connected to them are within a reasonable distance from them.

    If FIFA servers are picking Americans to play Against Brits or something along those lines on a smaller amount of servers you will have issues.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.